Publications
Controversy persists after Supreme Court established that mandatory extension is unconstitutional in judgment of ADIs.
CSRF's position on the levying of PIS and Cofins on apportionment of shared services expenses creates legal uncertainty by diverging from the standard already established by the Federal Revenue Service of Brazil.
With the increase in cases of covid-19 and the resumption of restrictions in some public organizacion, companies should plan for the use of mandatory facial protection in their facilities.
Decision of the Brazilian Supreme Court indicates that companies operating in Brazil should allow prior union intervention.
Introduced by EC 125/22, the new institute focuses on the importance of the role of the Superior Court of Justice in standardising the case law.
New decree resumes mandatory facial protection from November 26.
Page 70 of 241
