The Superior Court of Justice (STJ) established an understanding that electronic loan agreements signed through the Brazilian Public Keys Infrastructure (ICP-Brasil) have the enforceability of an enforceable instrument, thus dispensing with the need for signature by two witnesses. The opinion was obtained in the judgment of Special Appeal No. 1.495.920/DF, of the authorship of Justice Paulo de Tarso Sanseverino, on May 15, 2018.

Brazil has for years been witnessing an intense debate regarding the constitutional jurisdiction to tax the most varied of legal deals involving digital assets, more precisely software, whether it is the ICMS, ISS, or neither of the two.

The Brazilian Institute for the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (Ibama) published on August 14, 2018, Normative Instruction (IN) No. 18/2018, in order to allow more covered parties to join the fines conversion program. The new standard changes the transition rules set out in IN 06/2018 and, in practice, extends to 60 days the period originally established for covered parties to submit their requests to convert fines. With the change, adherence to the program may be requested until October 15, 2018.

Polychlorinated biphenyls, known as PCBs, are synthetic substances formed by a mixture of 209 chlorinated compounds. The Stockholm Convention, of which Brazil is a signatory, has classified PCBs as one of the twelve types of persistent organic pollutants (POPs), which are extremely polluting substances, which pose serious risks to the environment and human health and which should be phased out, according to the convention.

The Attorney General's Office (PGR) opined in October in favor of hearing and granting relief to Extraordinary Appeal (RE) 1037396, in order that article 19 of Law No. 12,965/2014, the Brazilian Civil Rights Framework for the Internet, be declared constitutional by the Federal Supreme Court (STF).

Law No. 13,467/17 (the Labor Reform) inserted article 652, f, into the Consolidated Labor Laws (CLT), thus expanding the jurisdiction of the Labor Courts to decide on the ratification of extrajudicial settlements. However, even with this change, parties (companies and workers) are having difficulty having these settlements ratified at trial level, since the judges allege the supposed unconstitutionality of article 652, f, of the CLT.